Repository navigation
docs: correct example content and surface-pore descriptions - #1265
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #1265 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 73.1% 73.1%
=====================================
Files 48 48
Lines 6976 6976
=====================================
Hits 5102 5102
Misses 1874 1874 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
jgostick
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 14, 2026 13:04
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Complete unfinished example explanations, align labels with their code, and clarify surface-pore connectivity and in-place filling behavior. Preserve the existing getting-started spelling correction.
Validation: 294 unit tests passed (3 existing skips), all 48 code cells in the seven changed notebooks passed, and focused Sphinx rendering, notebook schema checks, Ruff, and whitespace checks passed. Full unit suite and production documentation build were not run; notebook execution used nbval-lax without comparing saved outputs.
Related issue: #1232