Skip to content

Add actioneer-gtk - #9707

Merged
github-actions[bot] merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
discover/actioneer-gtk
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

github-actions[bot] merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
discover/actioneer-gtk

Conversation

@probonopd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Repository: https://github.com/makoni/actioneer-gtk

A native GNOME desktop client for GitHub Actions

  • Stars: 19
  • Release with the AppImage: 1.1.2 (2026-10-05T15:03:41Z)
  • AppImage asset: actioneer-1.1.2-x86_64.AppImage
  • License: MIT

Found by .github/workflows/discover-apps.yml, which looks for GitHub
repositories that publish AppImages but are not in the catalog yet. This
entry was not tested by a human; please review it before merging.

Discovered on GitHub as publishing AppImages on its releases, by
discover-apps.yml. Needs a maintainer's review.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added error-app-exits Test failed: the application quit or crashed right after starting error-glibc-too-new Test failed: built on a too new system (needs a newer glibc) labels Oct 7, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

❌ Test failure

@makoni: this pull request adds the AppImage from your GitHub repository to the AppImage catalog; the test reports the following. Could you have a look?

Tested:

Compatibility: not self-contained: uses the C library of the system; references glibc 2.39

Notes:

  • File name 'actioneer-gtk': all-lowercase names are typically used for command line tools, but the desktop file does not set Terminal=true. If this is a graphical application, please name the file after the application as it is spelled, with capitals where it has them (e.g. 'Krita'); if it is a command line tool, set Terminal=true in its desktop file.

  • The AppImage was built on a system that is too new. Please build it on the oldest still-supported Ubuntu LTS release so that it runs on all supported systems.

  • The application quit or crashed right after starting. The error below usually shows why.

First error in the log:

/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: weak version `GLIBC_2.39' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libadwaita-1.so.0)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgtk-4.so.1)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgtk-4.so.1)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libcairo.so.2)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libcairo.so.2)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libvulkan.so.1)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libxkbcommon.so.0)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.36' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libmount.so.1)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libmount.so.1)
/run/firejail/appimage/usr/bin/actioneer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libselinux.so.1)

What next: once the AppImage is fixed (e.g. in a new release), comment /retest here to test it again. If it should not be in the catalog after all, close this pull request; an app that is already in the catalog can be removed by a maintainer with /remove.

Commit 1343d09. Full log

@makoni

makoni commented Oct 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest

1.2.1 ships a self-contained AppImage that bundles glibc (built with quick-sharun), so it should now start on Ubuntu 22.04. Could the catalog entry be named Actioneer rather than actioneer-gtk? Thanks!

@probonopd probonopd closed this Oct 19, 2026
@probonopd probonopd reopened this Oct 19, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added error-not-squashfs Test failed: the AppImage could not be mounted (only SquashFS is supported, not DwarFS etc.) and removed error-app-exits Test failed: the application quit or crashed right after starting error-glibc-too-new Test failed: built on a too new system (needs a newer glibc) labels Oct 19, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

❌ Test failure

Tested:

  • actioneer-1.2.1-x86_64.AppImage from release 1.2.1

  • The AppImage could not be mounted. AppImageHub currently supports only AppImages with a SquashFS file system; other formats such as DwarFS (used, e.g., by uruntime and quick-sharun) are not supported yet.

First error in the log:

ERROR: Could not mount the AppImage. AppImageHub currently supports only AppImages with a SquashFS file system

What next: once the AppImage is fixed (e.g. in a new release), comment /retest here to test it again. If it should not be in the catalog after all, close this pull request; an app that is already in the catalog can be removed by a maintainer with /remove.

Commit 1343d09. Full log

@makoni

makoni commented Oct 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest

@probonopd probonopd closed this Oct 20, 2026
@probonopd probonopd reopened this Oct 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added screenshot-ok Test passed; the screenshot was checked and looks fine and removed error-not-squashfs Test failed: the AppImage could not be mounted (only SquashFS is supported, not DwarFS etc.) labels Oct 20, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Test passed

Please check that the screenshot shows the application's main window.

actioneer-gtk

actioneer-gtk

Tested:

Compatibility: self-contained (ships its own C library)

Notes:

  • File name 'actioneer-gtk': all-lowercase names are typically used for command line tools, but the desktop file does not set Terminal=true. If this is a graphical application, please name the file after the application as it is spelled, with capitals where it has them (e.g. 'Krita'); if it is a command line tool, set Terminal=true in its desktop file.

Commit 1343d09. Full log

@github-actions
github-actions Bot merged commit fa09bfa into master Oct 20, 2026
9 of 11 checks passed
@github-actions
github-actions Bot deleted the discover/actioneer-gtk branch October 20, 2026 19:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-discovered screenshot-ok Test passed; the screenshot was checked and looks fine

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants